
In an article published today on Small-biz-advisor.com, Neal Hollday presents an argument that programs such as E*Verify, and the No-Match rule could potentially drive small businesses, well, out of business. Many small businesses in the manufacturing, construction, and food service industries rely on readily available immigrant labor, and such verification programs present many challenges that could potentially stop the work flow and prove too costly.
Holladay writes from experience. He is currently an HR specialist, and former hiring manager in the Poultry Industry. In his article, he tells of people being turned away due to complications with the E*Verify system, even though they were eligible for employment. In addition, many potential employees did not meet qualifications, and never returned to clear up any errors. It could be that those workers were undocumented and here illegally, and decided to move on to another job. Even so, his business still relied on those workers because of the larger system that the United States has constructed that utilizes cheap immigrant labor to fill low-skilled positions.
Holladay writes,
“Employers in industries such as construction, facilities management, and agriculture who depend greatly on the availability of the immigrant workforce find themselves “caught between a rock and a hard place”. Many small businesses just can’t afford to turn away immigrants, who are often the only ones able and willing to fill manual labor positions…Despite paying prevailing wages, offering excellent benefits, and intensive recruiting efforts extending to a 60 mile radius, we would only seem to attract Mexican and Guatemalan immigrants. I found very few U.S citizens who were willing to work in poultry processing”
Holladay is not arguing for amnesty, nor supporting illegal immigration. He’s concern is for small businesses that may be forced to use an ineffective verification system that is expensive, time consuming, and cumbersome.
“If more states continue to pass legislation requiring employers to participate in the federal E-verify program, a program which the government admits is inadequate, it will make it virtually impossible for small business in key sectors of the economy to survive. Tighter enforcement in the workplace will backfire unless it is counterbalanced by an increase in the supply of legal workers to meet the demand.”
So how do we increase the supply of legal workers? One thought is to change the way America views higher education. Our current system attaches a lot of worth to a BA. It is almost a necessity in today’s market. Along with higher wages, social esteem also comes with earning a degree. It’s even in the language we use to descibe jobs and workers such as “high” and “low” skilled. If we change the way we look at construction, poultry, and manufacturing jobs we may make them more attractive both financially and socially, and thus more Americans may seek such positions. Why not create more trade schools and offer certificates for construction, and working in a meat-packing plant? Why not treat people that do so with more respect, and recognize how essential they are to our economy, as well as everyday lives?
Immigrants will always fill the jobs that “Americans don’t want to do” until we change the language we use to describe them, and the way we treat such workers. Thus, as Holladay knows all too well, these verification programs and restrictions will not only eliminate undocumented workers, but many small businesses who can’t find anyone else fill empty positions.
Read the full article here.